Search results

See posts 37 & 44

I merely pointed out your hypocrisy. As I said earlier, no one likes a busy body. As I also said earlier, the moderator in question is commonly reported, yet gets away with it. I even messaged the moderator a couple of weeks back a question and was completely ignored. Arrogance.

You literally had a public complaint against you earlier this week. There havevbeen many comments previously about you being reported. Yet you somehow get a god-like status who is untouchable.

As long as you join me there. After all, you had a public complaint against you earlier this week.............

So you're sending them home crying for their foot being off the floor. The exact thing you earlier said you wouldnt do.........

But what if they go home crying?

I take FA guidance with a pinch of salt. If you want to develop players, become a coach. Other than that, turn up, referee and leave.

No I wouldn't. But I'm also not going to teach them either. I said officiate, nothing to do with applying the laws of the game to the letter of the law. You're young, you're keen, you'll learn. No one wants a busy body.

I doubt a child is going to cry over that. And even then, they could still get it wrong after your coaching. Then what? If they're 6 years old, get the ball in play and get on with it.

Rubbish.

I ran the line on the NL N/S play-off final, means diddly squat. Or does it mean you should pay me extra attention on my guidance? The guidance says give them another go, not coach them.

No, it clearly says give them another chance, not coach them.

Getting 1 set of coaches praising you is not a major accomplishment. I'm sure they'd also praise you for not sending the caution through that you gave. Or for not giving the red card for the DOGSO because it was already 8-0. Same for league secretary's. They aren't necessarily referees- and...

Nope, this is being a busy body. Allow the 2nd throw by all means, but it is not your job to coach. How would you feel if the coach started to referee?

The league cannot guide you on laws of the game. This is similar yo leagues a few years back trying to ask referees to award free kicks of some didn't 'put a name on it'

That shows how long it is since I did mini soccer! But I'm still not coaching.

I wouldn't agree. We're there to officiate a football match. It's the managers/coaches jobs to teach them. If they aren't showing them this stuff in training, that's their problem. That's not to say pull up every u10 match for a slight foul throw, but we aren't necessarily there to coach people...

I'd imagine they would have to do some form of explanation somewhere as to why they're challenging. But whether they would want them to go into so much detail, I don't know. Saying it's for a foul is fine. But if they started specifying on the achilles etc, I don't know if that would work. From...

That could happen. Or the referee gets a second look, changes his decision and is seen as being human. Newcastle challenge the non-pen vs Utd; I think onfield ref says penalty once he sees it again.

Which is exactly why I've said to give it a go. Gives them an element of control, but more importantly, accountability.