Search results

should this not have been a red? deliberately leaving the technical area to: • show dissent towards, or remonstrate with, a match official

In settings. Turn off second last optio

sky are showing it tonight at 8pm

Just to see if there was any debate with it being removed prior to the goal being scored

https://x.com/mundialmag/status/1698350136605221257?s=46&t=QzHk_fLUmQraFX6Gyt4TWA Debate away

I believe so

It’s only allowed here from lowland/highland league and above. (SWPL1 also)

What a save from the keeper but

Not for me. Ezes looking for it. I’d have supported a caution for simulation

We not be comfortable having a IDFK here but it seems to me the laws are pretty clear on this one. The player interferes, stop play, send him off then idfk restart. Same as other laws we might not like but still follow

I may be mistaken but Euro 2024 is Uefa so fifa badge isn’t required.

Navy background on black tops. Nasty

Referees on the senior list up here have gotten free kit for years. Don’t think lower level refs will be that bothered

Not really. Charity match. Nobody is fussed about those details. Been that way since the first soccer aid in 2006

Done this same thread 2 years ago https://www.footyheadlines.com/2023/06/debut-in-ucl-final-23-25-uefa-referee.html?m=1 Quite surprised that Marcinek would be in the volt tomorrow Prefer the current macron kit. Lines across the pockets could look like eye brows if somebody adds big googly eyes

He will hardly care about any mark given

Del Cerros last game may have had an impact on his decision. Not making it about himself etc etc

Was thinking this myself. Perhaps a booking if not already on one

This hasnt been the best refereeing I’ve seen. Simple decisions been missed. Fiorentina players down at every opportunity but no excuse for the west ham fans. Ridiculous. For the record @JamesL it was Benrahma who dived, clear simulation.