Search results

I think it's a foul but not sure if it's a clear and obvious error, I'm not totally convinced the arm across makes the keeper drop the ball but he probably was impeded. If there is another episode of mic'd up, then this definately will be shown and in fairness from mostly what I can see, most...

To be fair to the referees on the announcements, some refs will no doubt be confident and there be some refs won't be(I mean must be daunting having so many eyes and ears focused on you when doing those announcements) so Madley perhaps keeping it simple instead of potentially going into a...

I could maybe accept the first one of getting it wrong although the assistant is right there and perhaps should of seen where the point of contact was but the second one Im struggling too see how a PL ref can get that one wrong when he's staring right at it and it felt like he tried to cop out...

Going back to the thread in question, I have seen cases if a player heads the ball downwards and it hits his own arm or tries to clear a ball and hits his own arm then no penalty is the right outcome as your not seeking any advantage by doing that. I do think regardless what the ruling is I...

That's the thing for me, if someone is running and a player grabs some strands of hair the force increases and it justifies a red card, from a standing position, the force I'm seeing in some of these incidents just does not warrant a red card for me. I actually think the Calvert Lewin one in the...

Yep the tackle I think is definately the orange card variety where the VAR can support a yellow/red card either way. Any higher with the contact then it has to be a certain red. No surprise we hear a Man City commentator coming out with rubbish that has never been proven that a referee is scared...

I think the first one perhaps confirms my suspicions that Scotland probably is more in line with UEFA that they expect soft penalties given to be sent for review as they focus on impact. In England this would be fully nailed as refs call and I got to say I don't mind things being sent for...

I'm a bit confused that some people think the ball can just spin in a different direction mid air. It clearly touches the fingers and changed the trajectory of the ball towards the goal. There's this weird obsession in football that we don't like small margins like tight offsides for example...

Certainly not in the PL but like in Scotland, the threshold is clearly lower for intervention so it's one of those where instead of refs call, if what the ref describes don't match the pictures, a review will be called. I think the argument will be that sort of slight contact is not enough to...

Alot of controversy in this game it's fair to say. I do feel the first penalty is totally the correct decision. The second one is a clear UEFA handball so again the correct decision and I do wish whilst pundits may not agree with the UEFA interpretation of handball, they back the referee and say...

I must admit, I thought at one point he did had a grab of the hair and as Cucurella was moving at pace, it would definitely create some force but you got to be 100% sure and I don't think the evidence is fully conclusive so VAR right not to get involved.

If that type of contact was with the hand in a forward movement, it be an automatic red card like it was with Gueye's slap which let face it was not excessive force(I doubt Keane had a red slap mark on his face) but it's still a red card. If Taylor only gives a yellow card in a World Cup game...

It's not a headbutt that you will see in a street brawl of course not but it's a clear unjustified forward movement onto the head of Haaland and as Big Cat post shows, we have seen red cards for much less in the past. Football expects a red card and the law certainly suggests it should be a red...

Well former referee Graham Scott has backed Anthony Taylor's decision of only showing a yellow card with Graham saying "it looked like a potential headbutt but he(Haaland) was stepping away and there was no contact that would look like violent conduct to the referee". I mean surely it's not just...

It's smacks of let keep it 11 against 11 because its the biggest game of the season it also smacks of the VAR being afraid to overrule Taylor because I assumed he saw it properly and decided yellow was enough. On the other hand, whilst Haaland was very honest here, if he went down clutching...

I think even the PGMO wording suggests this perhaps should not be a red. For one, the players are challenging for the ball and secondly there is no force, if this occured way off the ball as their wording says then I probably would support the red card more. Of course on the flip side, since...

As with the Keane one, the force is negligible and there could be an element of doubt it was fully intentional to go for the hair. For me to be classed as violent conduct, it has to be deliberate, sustained and some evidence of force for a sending off. The Jack Stephens one last season is a good...

They are different but the level of contact looks similar too me and when I say they are different I mean more in the fact Mitrovic was already speaking to the ref and it was not until he did the shove/nudge and the red card came out he became overly aggressive towards the referee. Maybe the...

Hard to tell with the first one, it does look like it might just be outside of the area where the contact is made, no real issue with me if the VAR did give definate proof it was outside the area. The second one is just baffling, how can a FIFA ref go to the screen and thinks yeah I got that...

I can accept a yellow here but then Fulham can argue why did Mitrovic get a red card and a 8 game ban for giving the ref a small nudge on the arm, it clearly just down to the interpretation of the ref on the day but maybe the law should be changed that any contact on a referee that is a...