Search results

He obviously was sure. Arm is in a justifiable position for the movement in that situation.

When they don't reply I tell them it they don't tell me I will assume yes. That normally gets the response

I think in law it says offence punished with a free kick. So the offence you have penalised is punished by a free kick. The difference is offences that are punished with a free kick inside the boundary of the penalty area, the free kick is a penalty.

Exactly. I dropped a glass and it smashed yesterday. I did a similar FFS hand to the head. I knew I had a smashed a glass but I did not intend to do it.

In England, perhaps. Maybe different in Australia?

Competition rules. @rusty ref is the SCOR guru who will be able to tell us if this is a mandatory or optional for comp rules.

A phrase I use which may or may not work for you is "mutual holding". Players seem to understand that at the level.i am at that where they are both holding they just have to get on with it. If foul contact happens, if it's a foul and the player continues, you could signal advantage but be wary...

On this occasion the thread was closed last night..then someone who was involved with the closed thread started a new one hence why I closed it straight away given the nature of the opening post. As I have said earlier in this thread, feel free to open a new thread and have a sensible debate...

I've also asked them before and received a similar reply. No offence. This is covered in law that offences outside the field of play dictate a restart to which the closes boundary is and therefore a GK handling the ball here would be considered as using his hand withing the PA and as such not...

Depends which one exactly you are referring to... If someone wants to open a thread and some how keep the topics off playing until Liverpool score and indirectly wishing a colleague takes a long time to recover having cast doubts on their injury in the first place you are more than welcome to...

The threads keep getting closed due to a seemingly incapability to post sensibly about it without fan bias or nonsense!

Thanks for.all the effort you put into it mate. Was fun while it lasted

Maybe so. If it was a run or the mill league game I'd perhaps agree but it's county cup which usually does have some thought out into it.

And the other L.

Yes very true. I was leaning more towards people having a different view on it and had neglected to remember that this is actually covered more explicitly in law than OP. 🤦🏻

Thanks both. Proved my point of where I was headed with it. 😊

Scenario that popped into my head on this one. At the start of penalty shoot out team A has 10 Players and Team B has 11. Team B opts to exclude the GK. Player 2 is nominated as Goalkeeper. During the penalty shootout Player 2 becomes injured. Team B has no substitutions available...

I think dissent is the obvious decision, but depending on the words used along with the action offinabus can also be supported. Player tries the classic I was saying something else trick (I think he is trying to say he was saying the defender hit him in the head). These examples are great for...

Ross' new home: Your generosity knows no bounds Refchat users.