Search results

anything more on this? is there any functionality within the website to check in on him personally?

looks like plain old dissent to me

Absolute shocker and totally in keeping with his first half performance

i was thinking this! if they look at the video, decide they're wrong but not made a clear and obvious error, what's the expected outcome?!

yeah answered below that it may not be a clear and obvious error, that said a question mark here shouldn't preclude it

i think the 'wideness' is a reg herring - he is going wide but he's not going to continue on that trajectory, he's going to turn and run directly at goal from a slight angle. i think it's probably borderline for a clear and obvious error

likelihood of control - definite yes proximity to the goal - control of the ball would have occured within the penalty area general direction of play - will be directly towards goal once ball is controlled proximity of defenders - closing but imo not quick enough 2 potential question marks but...

Yep, sfp for me Carding technique looks dodgy, unless he's already told him whats coming

this is an incredibly small hill to pick to die on (for the ref/lino) imo. obviously only works if all refs at all levels are on the same page too

Do it, definitely

that's outstanding - contradicts in line 12 what it said in line 9 :D

cheers for that (i was searched a number of combinations of sin bin / dissent / half time and couldnt find it!) yeah looks like he has got it wrong unfortunately i suggested he should have avoided all of this by just sending him off :D

trying to help a friend out...and i know we've discussed this before (to death probably) but i can't find any previous threads in a recent step 5 game he's given a dissent caution at half time whilst still on the field, observer has queried not using the sin bin to which the ref replied saying...

i'd double and triple checked on the replay to try and find a hidden player! fair enough...case closed

just confirming there is var in these games isn't there...pretty sure there is...

what am i missing here? this is a clear offside isn't it? https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/live/cx2pm7lvxevt Scotland equaliser from 1.22 ish

Yeah would definitely expect them to get in touch, my cfa did the week after I abandoned a game with 5 misconduct reports. Always seems that many cfas don't do the basics, like this, well

Good on you for submitting the report, can be especially hard as a new ref to do Can I ask when the game happened?

Eh what? The '4th' isn't a 4th, it's a celtic coach The ref has been backed here and at the game despite obvious evidence to the contrary

That's a celtic official/coach, Adidas branding Refs backing up Refs mistakes ad usual