Search results

you be fine. best and most fun exam you ever take. all the best.

when he blow the whistle he could have award a foul against vardy for foul on the west ham defender. nobody would be talking about it now. He has opened up himself to scrutiny now. When i play goes down easily in the box. Moss should be cautioning them all.

It looked offside. Only when you freeze frame it and look at few times. do you go. Oh was level. Was a definite by foul Carrol. he clearly pulling away at the defender ti get round him.

I found it great fun. Did the course as often when I ran my sunday team. Be no refs or ref would not turn up and thought it be handy to know the laws fully and give me credibility. Now ref more than i play. I really looked forward to Tuesday night and felt a wee bit down when it was all over...

looked 50/50 from refs view. Watford player went in just as much as Arsenal player.

Good post Russell Jones. Cynical or unlucky. Referees are able to decide if its a careless-no caution or reckless- caution. then you should be able to decide if a challenge was genuine or not. Genuine challange=careless. Maybe they should say in a DOGSO situation then if ref decides its...

all good banter. :-)

it all happened so quick. the player that got the ball came round the back on far side. Can still see why he gave offside

if i have to explain to you . Then you really should not be referring. i do find it easy to work out when someone makes a genuine challenge to non genuine challenge. just like i can work out when a player does a foul throw or not or player deliberately dives or not.

offside . attacker went to towards the ball and only stopped when he saw his colleague going to the ball .

Don't understand the issue. Genuine challenge is easy to work out. It means you will not have to send a player off automatically if he stops attacker a chance a goal. Only deliberately and malicious challenges will result in sending off.