Russell Jones's latest activity
-
This was a very unusual circumstance with a lot of things happening. Commenting on it here is one thing, learning from it is another. If... -
Graham Scott has been talking about that today, and I tend to agree that would be the right outcome for football here. There was...
-
It's a deliberate foul. Some would describe that as cheating. I'm not saying it wasn't warranted or expected. It wasn't a sleight on...
-
I'm not interpreting the law in a way they're not written, I'm suggesting a case could be made to change the law for it to be included...
-
There seems to be a misconception (or at least I believe it to be a misconception) from some referees that if you 'play advantage' the...
-
Russell Jones replied to the thread LIV v MCI.
-
I don’t understand the confusion relating to the end scenario. I find it hard to believe Pawson didn’t see either of the blatant...
-
For anyone who says a goal was scored, it wasn't. Law 10:
-
Russell Jones replied to the thread LIV v MCI.One involves an unnecessary and theatrical dive to the ground. One doesn’t. 😊
-
Russell Jones replied to the thread LIV v MCI.Haaland is about 2 yards in his own half when the ball is played. Though, interestingly the AR has started to, incorrectly, drop with...
-
A very complicated situation. Thread will run into double-figure pages most likely The referee presumably played advantage because he...
-
If the ‘goal’ had been allowed to stand and the title goes on to decided on goals cored and City outstrip Arsenal by one goal, would...
-
Yes, but he only scored because Haaland fouled Szoboslai, without that foul he would probably have stopped the ball from crossing the line.
-
Just no. You don't get to ignore a foul jusy so you can bottle a RC.
-
Correct VAR intervention, can’t allow a foul to be committed during an advantage.
