I think politician is probably the perfect way to answer it. He didn’t really give an opinion on right or wrong, just that it was understandable.
What I really did not like was the comms between Referee and AR. AR claims line of sight, which he has got no chance of telling from a side on angle...
Of course its a lottery. They claim its for clear & obvious, yet we sit for 5 minutes whilst they look at something in slow motion. That would suggest it is neither clear or obvious.
So because other people are poor at communication, it is okay for them to be poor at it? A basic skill within...
Agreed it takes a lot of hard work. But they aren't always there for the reason I'm sure you're suggesting. Plenty of officials have not made it to the top as their face didn't fit. Not a chance the likes of Mason or Mike Jones were ever good enough to be top flight. But we're steering a bit too...
You didn’t say you always need to defend them. It’s something you literally do.
If that is true that you know the official in question, you’d know they have no issues with people not always agreeing or defending them. Something people in here have an absolute obsession with.
Problem is...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.