RefereeX's latest activity
-
RRefereeX replied to the thread Seasonal 5-4.There are still automatic promotions. 2-1 doesn't have assessment day this season. Nobody was promoted mid season and I'm led to...
-
RRefereeX replied to the thread Seasonal 5-4.Does this mean you're going again?
-
RAssessment day emails are starting to go out 👍
-
RWon appeals are very few and far between, but there have been some eg: 2023/24- Uttoxeter Town were successful in securing a reprieve...
-
RRefereeX replied to the thread NLS allocations out.Is there any precedent for teams having successful appeals? If there is, I don't remember it. Crazy how far the NL North stretches down...
-
RI don’t think HW could/would defend the indefensible, but in this case, the words that came from him were a fair reflection of what...
-
RRefereeX replied to the thread Seasonal 5-4.27th May / 28th may for L4s
-
RRefereeX replied to the thread Seasonal 5-4.I don't think anyone knows, even the FA, at the moment, but my best guess would be that it'll perhaps be on Friday 29th May, which is...
-
RUser error....
-
RDo you not have staff for that sort of task? 🤔😁
-
RRefereeX replied to the thread Buzzer flags.I'm gonna oppose this viewpoint. While I do acknowledge that the touchline flags are far better made than their competitors, I...
-
RRefereeX replied to the thread Player Behaviour Initiatives.I do agree about the signal. I haven't used captains only protocol as such. Because there's no way for people to know before the get to...
-
RAs others have said, the 'offside' goal is, ultimately, legitimate. What's frustrating (for me) is that so much of the discussion has...
-
RRefereeX replied to the thread Birmingham Vs Pompey.1 player a piece was cautioned, presumably for AA as a leveller.
-
RRefereeX replied to the thread Everton v Manchester City.I don't think that's SFP. Yeah agree that the goal is correct to stand. Presumably a little bit of a misunderstanding between Burt and...
