Recent content by Paul_10

What's really disappointing for me is this incident was not included on mic'd up show but instead show a straight forward obvious refereeing error in the City Ipswich game which then you have Webb claiming this is a good use of VAR which it was but it was such an obvious situation there was...

Said it before and I say it again, I think the word reckless to describe a yellow card tackle is not the right word to use because virtually everyone(and there is intelligent people out there who also say it) associates the word reckless as dangerous therefore thinking reckless tackle is a red...

Think the issue was that the referee did not even award a foul so there's a clear and obvious error and that foul in the VAR mind was a DOGSO hence the review. I really don't see the debate here though, if the defender did not foul the attacker, he would of regained the ball and have a shot at...

Seems I'm in the minority but this looks like a DOGSO too me, the keeper was not running towards the ball and the ball was much closer to the attacker when the foul happened. If the keeper was running towards the ball then fair enough but for me the attacker was most definately getting to that...

I thought it was the correct decision aswell, Doku was breaking forward and it was a cynical trip. No doubt we will hear comments the red card ruined the game but it was not the best game before that and Liverpool have played very poorly with 10 men unlike their opponents when they were down to...

Funny ain't it that their is journalists who want VAR scrapped(and I'm sure Winter is one of those) and wants the refs to make the decisions but when we see bad decisions being made, the clamour for VAR is there. I think VAR in the championship will arrive sooner rather than later, the noise...

Hearing the audio and I think this for me reflects badly more on the AVAR because his complete silence during the whole check is unhelpful and he should be there as those extra pair of eyes on the footage and should be 100% concentrated. The process for the SAOT does seem quite a bit of a faff...

Disallowed goal with most people thinking Haaland strayed offside going by the camera angle(as Neville was so adamant that was the case). One thing I have found slightly amusing in Carraghers analysis last night was the Foden red card. Pundits have been criticizing refs for not making on field...

Yeah I thought he had an reasonable game also and he made a "brave" decision of sending a player off in the first half in a huge game and whilst in some ways I think yellows for both would feel the better outcome(as I'm not convinced Foden's kick out was violent, it was more petulant and I'm not...

Could be consequences for Matt Donohue as this is the second occasion where it's possible that he's misapplied the laws as a VAR(Palace v Chelsea the other game). I mean it's hard to say if he's misapplied the laws here or he just genuinely did not believe a possible subjective offside offense...

I think a yellow for both would be the more right punishment, I don't think Foden kick out was particularly violent and it was not studs into the stomach and Fernandes most definitely milked it. Was always unlikely the VAR would overturn it though.

I don't think it was a penalty at all and it should of been overturned, Ballard has Konsas arm locked in and it was Ballard that caused the fall. I wouldn't blame the referee but the VAR has too see who caused both of the players to go down and see it was the Sunderland player who caused that...

It's not and I think Webb says they want th VAR's to do a it this way as it stops having the ref to stop play at a random moment to check something that may of happened a few minutes before. In fairness I am amazed this is the first time it happened as when you hear the mic'd up clips, something...

Because the Ipswich player kicks the Liverpool player on the foot which makes him lose his balance. Ref was probably blindside and thought the Ipswich defender played the ball but clearly he didn't so would of been a correct recommendation for a review. It does look a bit silly sending the ref...

Its funny how one incident means we should get rid of the boards but I don't think the TV companies will like that as they won't be able to do the shot of the 4th official holding the board up too see who's coming off. That said these days the TV companies know who's coming off well before a sub...