The Ref Stop

Recent content by Johnson

  1. J

    Middlesbrough vs s Southampton

    Doesn’t matter. If the referee is incapacitated, play may continue under the supervision of the other match officials until the ball goes out of play.
  2. J

    Wolves v Sunderland - Hair Pulling

    I’m not even sure how you justify a red card in Law for this. No hint of excessive force or deliberate violence.
  3. J

    Man United Vs Leeds - Hair Pulling

    It says or. Even if it didn’t, it would still work in my opinion. Pulling someone’s hair is just so far outside of anything expected in a game of football.
  4. J

    Man United Vs Leeds - Hair Pulling

    I think we’ve got hung up on the excessive force part of VC. Brutality is also there which literally includes “deliberately violent” in its definition. A deliberate hair pull could certainly fall under that. This was deliberate for me (I’m kind of envious of how Pollyannaish those who think it...
  5. J

    Goalkeeper Control 2025/26

    I’ve just realised that “or by touching it with any part of the hands or arms, except if the ball rebounds from the goalkeeper or the goalkeeper has made a save” (which was in the 2024/25 LOTG) appears to have been removed from the definition of the goalkeeper having control of the ball with the...
  6. J

    A&H International LOTG question

    You were right for the reason you stated. Edit: grammar
  7. J

    Martinelli incident - Southampton vs Arsenal FA Cup QF

    Necessary force can’t be the actual minimum amount of force else all contact that isn’t a challenge for the ball is a red card.
  8. J

    Martinelli incident - Southampton vs Arsenal FA Cup QF

    Agree that the threshold for excessive is lower against a match official but it’s not zero. Whilst brutality isn’t required for VC, it can be a guide for what kind and severity of actions warrant the sanction. Was the push savage, ruthless or deliberately violent? No. I’ve had players push me...
  9. J

    Martinelli incident - Southampton vs Arsenal FA Cup QF

    I’m happy with yellow. He’s pushing him out of the way to take the free kick quickly.
  10. J

    PIADM LCFC V BCFC

    There’s two definitions of includes in English; “for example” and “has as one of its features”. In isolation, both work here. IFAB has clarified they mean “for example”. Therefore, we apply the Law that way. The only case when we should reject IFAB rulings is when there is no interpretation...
  11. J

    PIADM LCFC V BCFC

    The 4th criteria isn’t required. This Q&A is wrong btw. If the defender is cautioned for a reckless challenge or sent-off for using excessive force, the restart is a direct free kick.
  12. J

    Manager sent-off

    There’s always “using unauthorised electronic or communication equipment and/or behaving in an inappropriate manner as a result of using electronic or communication equipment”
  13. J

    Newcastle v Man City

    Coaches must behave in a responsible manner.
  14. J

    City v Newcastle

    Nothing better than discussing hypotheticals. :) Accept that the push isn’t careless and play is stopped to issue a yellow card for unsporting behaviour. Don’t think we ever get to “any other offence, not mentioned in the Laws” though since there is a restart specified, a direct free kick as...
  15. J

    City v Newcastle

    DFK no? Offence involves contact.
Back
Top