Recent content by Iain

the Forrest one v Chelsea had no impact. he was not getting to it. cross was over hit.

just looked it up. great decision to ban home 2 games . he could have least gone over to the keeper. no consideration or concern.

good that PGMOL have come out and said var intervention was wrong. Not what VAR was sold for. If ref had given it at the time fine. i guess would not be discussing it .

did he have enough time to even think about it . he natural planted his foot = football is a contact sport. VAR should not be getting involved in that

Crazy for VAR intervention. What he supposed to do. when he plants his foot. Ref was close. never gave it. not clear and obs error.

many people criticizing are basing their opinion on number of opportunities to view it . ref got one look and one view if it only.

was it violent. no.

A caution for the GK would have been fair too. the touch to the face was minimal and wasn't violent in any way all all. more violence with people bumping each other with trolleys in the Xmas rush at Tesco.

The Preston player could have had two cautions. one for the push. and one for the simulation. 10 v 10. been a fair outcome.

if u give handball against man u then u have to give that one. Both the same. both are farcical and Robbie Savage talks absolute rubbish

if players think they may be a chance of a red card for this cheating style of challenge. Bannon did it as he thought he get caution only. take one for the team.

nope. not for me. barely touches him. not enough to give that

was no push. slight contact and player goes down. good use of VAR

Brushes his fingers and had no impact on the clearance. Was not deliberate.

Its a red card. No need to be making a challenge like that.