It is pointed out in Twitter that the card was not because of his antics with the ball but because he said to the ref: "Are you going home on West Brom coach you thunderc@nt?"
In which case it should have been a straight red for OFFINABUS, not another yellow ...It is pointed out in Twitter that the card was not because of his antics with the ball but because he said to the ref: "Are you going home on West Brom coach you thunderc@nt?"
Shouldn’t that be a straight red?It is pointed out in Twitter that the card was not because of his antics with the ball but because he said to the ref: "Are you going home on West Brom coach you thunderc@nt?"
I obviously didn't read into the comments here because I didn't know about the dissent...
Dissent?I obviously didn't read into the comments here because I didn't know about the dissent...
It falls under offensive, insulting and abusive language, which is a red card offence, yes."Thunder C" would fall under personal attack, right? So a straight red card is appropriate?
Agreed about the Twitter source.
Are you a tv football commentator by any chanceI wasn't differentiating between "offensive, insulting and abusive language" and "dissent."
This. ^ ^ ^ ^Especially if accompanied by "fruity" language, although I find that Twitter claim a bit hard to believe, even if Andy Woolmer decided not to pull a straight red his body language almost certainly wouldn't have been that calm if someone had really used the words claimed.
If it was in an aggressive manner it would be VC rather than a second caution. Don't think anyone is trying to say that, rather he has thrown the ball twice against a player not even looking at him, why no just roll it to his feet? He knew what he was doing, and Ben Pearson has previous for his disciplinary record (88 yellows and 4 reds).Parking amy potential dissent or OFFINABUS, I don’t see the ball being thrown in an aggressive manner, if the W Brom player wasn’t intent on time wasting, he would have caught it & taken the throw in.
Although difficult to ignore, it is unfair to judge based on a person's previous record – people change!If it was in an aggressive manner it would be VC rather than a second caution. Don't think anyone is trying to say that, rather he has thrown the ball twice against a player not even looking at him, why no just roll it to his feet? He knew what he was doing, and Ben Pearson has previous for his disciplinary record (88 yellows and 4 reds).
That was just an added comment, I wasn't basing the outcome on that.Although difficult to ignore, it is unfair to judge based on a person's previous record – people change!