Today I refereed an under 14 academy match where, I think it was fair to say, the majority of the decisions went in the home side's favour. It is worth noting at this point that my policy is that if somebody calls me a cheat, or accuses me of cheating then I send them off.
After the game, when the players were shaking hands, the goalkeeper of the away side asked how much I was being paid. I took him to the side and asked what he was implying, but he was as thick as two short planks so I said 'are you calling me a cheat?' to which he said 'maybe', and eventually I got an answer of know out of him. He was clearly implying that I was a cheat, but because he did not say it directly, I felt that it would have been a difficult one to sell. Looking back I think maybe I should have sent him off but I'm not sure - should I have done?
After the game, when the players were shaking hands, the goalkeeper of the away side asked how much I was being paid. I took him to the side and asked what he was implying, but he was as thick as two short planks so I said 'are you calling me a cheat?' to which he said 'maybe', and eventually I got an answer of know out of him. He was clearly implying that I was a cheat, but because he did not say it directly, I felt that it would have been a difficult one to sell. Looking back I think maybe I should have sent him off but I'm not sure - should I have done?