In my last game, one of the most intense and competitive I've ever handled, I experienced a situation that was a first for me.
With the game tied in the second half, a through ball is played towards the left winger right along the touchline. There are some players from the defending team warming up on that side, and when the ball gets close to one of them, he sticks his foot out onto the pitch and flicks it over the touchline. I immediately recognise the situation and the potential riot, so I sprint across, push the infuriated attacker away and I quickly pull out my red card while protecting the offender and I sternly tell the mob of players and substitutes that has gathered to "leave him alone or there will be cautions".
Once the commotion has settled I realise that I don't think I have grounds for a straight red, it's not SFP, not VC, not DOGSO, not spitting and not OFFINABUS. I call the player back, telling him I made a mistake, he's not entitled to a straight red, so I show him two yellows, one for entering without permission and the other for unsporting behaviour, before showing the red again. Everyone accepts my changed decision, though I had to explain quite thoroughly to some players and coaches.
My question is: What was correct? Was he entitled to a straight red, two cautions or just one caution?
With the game tied in the second half, a through ball is played towards the left winger right along the touchline. There are some players from the defending team warming up on that side, and when the ball gets close to one of them, he sticks his foot out onto the pitch and flicks it over the touchline. I immediately recognise the situation and the potential riot, so I sprint across, push the infuriated attacker away and I quickly pull out my red card while protecting the offender and I sternly tell the mob of players and substitutes that has gathered to "leave him alone or there will be cautions".
Once the commotion has settled I realise that I don't think I have grounds for a straight red, it's not SFP, not VC, not DOGSO, not spitting and not OFFINABUS. I call the player back, telling him I made a mistake, he's not entitled to a straight red, so I show him two yellows, one for entering without permission and the other for unsporting behaviour, before showing the red again. Everyone accepts my changed decision, though I had to explain quite thoroughly to some players and coaches.
My question is: What was correct? Was he entitled to a straight red, two cautions or just one caution?