Week 22 Laws of the Game Quiz 2020-2021. Video for question 1 Below you’ll see the embedded video for question 1. Laden…
Continue reading...
Continue reading...
Two issues with the answer given here. The video is not clear enough to be definitive on encroachment. Even if there was encroachment retake is the wrong answer. A goal was not scored from the penalty kick but from general play after continued so this would have to be a IFK if there was encroachment
But that not what the answer says. It says because the team mate of the taker encroached it's a retake. That's only true if the penalty taker scores.the end result is irrelevant - if both players encroach it’s a retake.
100% agree with @one on the first question. If the defender did not encroach, it's an IFK, as the PK did not score. But I thought it clear enough that both did that retake is still the correct answer on the play.
And I also thought there was the same guidance he referenced on the tunnel. The law provision says to prevent the players from taking part in the match. It doesn't say to show cards. (Though this is one of those "who cares" scenarios; whether you show cards in the tunnel really doesn't matter.)