Agree. It's not a sellable decision however correct.i'd love (hate?) to see questions 4 and 5 in real life
Slight advantage this week.
Had question 4/5 at a Core meeting and I was the only person in the room to get it right.
Agree. It's not a sellable decision however correct.
It was after it first changed. Range of answers.haha absolutely, imagine explaining that at any level to the players/coaches etc. good luck!
surprised more didnt get it right, seems a fairly straightforward question to me? what's the restart for PIADM and the sanction if it's DOGSO?
It was after it first changed. Range of answers.
People weren't looking past the attempt for the ball clause and going caution, not realising a PK had to be awarded for a caution.
Like most everyone else, quite unlikely I'd give it in the first place!5/5 but I’d be surprised if i got this right in an actual game. I wonder what a team would prefer, a pen and yellow or a red and idfk
The wording of the question is clear PIADAM and no contact and nothing further. So there is only one answer to the quiz.
But in a real game situation it is not as Balck and white as that. You could also deem it as attempting to kick as well as PIADAM which makes it a pen and caution.
I'd have to correct myself here. If you consider it as both PIADAM and attempting to kick then PIADAM (combined with DOGSO) would take priority with the higher sanction.The wording of the question is clear PIADAM and no contact and nothing further. So there is only one answer to the quiz.
But in a real game situation it is not as Balck and white as that. You could also deem it as attempting to kick as well as PIADAM which makes it a pen and caution.
I don't think that is black and white though.I'd have to correct myself here. If you consider it as both PIADAM and attempting to kick then PIADAM (combined with DOGSO) would take priority with the higher sanction.
If it is only considered attempting to kick then it's pen and yellow.
I don't think that is black and white though.
Red more severe than yellow
PK more severe than idfk
Tactical impact - PK better opportunity for a a goal
Physical severity - attempting to kick is deemed as a greater physical severity (assumed as the sanction is DFK not idfk)
So that's a 3:1 victory for PK and YC is it not?
I don't think it works that way. Once red wins over yellow, you don't look at the rest.I don't think that is black and white though.
Red more severe than yellow
PK more severe than idfk
Tactical impact - PK better opportunity for a a goal but is that better than playing against 10 men?
Physical severity - attempting to kick is deemed as a greater physical severity (assumed as the sanction is DFK which is more severe than idfk)
So that's a 3:1 victory for PK and YC is it not? Or a 2:2 draw.
Agree. But could it be a careless (or reckless) challenge now that "tackle" expanded to "tackles or challenges"?if he's attemtping to kick the ball i'd suggest it couldnt be categorised as attempting to kick an opponent