Week 28 Laws of the Game Quiz 2019-2020. Questions made by Brian Scholz. NB: you can always find the quiz archive on this specific quiz page. Laden…
Continue reading...
Continue reading...
This gives context for why the incident occurs, and is a factor that many referees may reasonably think to consider, whether or not it is correct to consider it.Good questions. Some additional information given that could mislead there read as to a condition of the correct answers.
Q1. The answer does not change even if the referee has not dealt with fouls in the first half with correct sanctions.
Again, many referees are of the belief that the substitution occurs at this time. It is reasonable to mention this in light of avoiding any confusion in what the correct outcome here should be.Q3. The answer does not change even if the substitute has entered the field of play as the substitution procedure is still not complete.
And again, many referees think it does, and therefore getting this wrong points them to the information they need to read.Q4. The answer does not change even if the ball is handled inside the goal area.
It hasn't left the six yard box, so the goal kick is taken again.When you say, many referees, are you suggesting many referees do not understand two yellows equals red equals player less?
Barring Graham Poll, before someone else says it?
and, are you saying maybe referees do not realise deliberate handball by a defender anywhere in the penalty area is a penalty kick?
Seems strange and I would have suggested few, very few referees would think otherwise, be interested to get facts and figures, as both situations are quite straightforward
It hasn't left the six yard box, so the goal kick is taken again.
The attacker was still inside the box, so he gets cautioned and it's taken again.
If the sub has stepped onto the field, the sub has happened and you can't caution them.
The sub is allowed to walk off at halfway.
The manager is the only one allowed to ask the referee about things.
Especially if they think the decisions were wrong.
You find a brand new referee that doesn't have a single misconception about the law at all, and you'll have the next triple-promotion candidate in front of you. Get their signature now, it'll be worth lots when they finish their third consecutive World Cup final.
Me too. All green. Don't know what all the fuss is about, although @one made some astute observationsI'm taking my 4/4 and my ball home. And I still haven't refereed a match under the 2019-20 laws
I would double like your post if this was a game management quiz. It is not. It a LOTG quiz. As the title says it. It's a quiz on testing how well you know the laws of the game and not how well you can manage a game.This gives context for why the incident occurs, and is a factor that many referees may reasonably think to consider, whether or not it is correct to consider it.
Again, many referees are of the belief that the substitution occurs at this time. It is reasonable to mention this in light of avoiding any confusion in what the correct outcome here should be.
And again, many referees think it does, and therefore getting this wrong points them to the information they need to read.
The point of a quiz should not be to describe a situation in a way identical to that used in law (terminology is not a situation itself) so that perfect lawyers can ace it. It's to present events that may occur with points that are common when they do and which may affect referees' thinking at the time, so that referees recognise what factors do affect each of various outcomes.
I'd be even more surprised to find where anybody in this thread except you has mentioned that two cautions is anything other than dismissal, but I expect I'll be waiting a long time.Nobody doubting not everybody, from me to you to anyone, will get every law correct everytime.
It was the reference to, many referees.
From my knowledge and experience, I would say its a total reverse, much truer to say, a few referees.
I would go further and suggest that a brand new referee might even have more chance of knowing these answers as a mature referee, as for some, it is all they will know.
Unlike some of us who need to quickly play back 30 years of changes before making our call, they only know the one outcome, the current correct one,
i be very surprised to hear from any referee, never mind many, who are not aware two yellows equals a red.