Week 12 Laws of the Game Quiz 2019-2020. The last quiz of November. Can you score all weeks this month with 5 out of 5? Laden…
Continue reading...
Continue reading...
By my calculation, it is possible to be 23.26m from goal and still be in the PAQ1, if in the PA then all answers are incorrect
No. Playing in a dangerous manner "includes preventing a nearby opponent from playing the ball for fear of injury" as a criterion.Also on the GK question.
If a team mate played the ball while it was 'under control by the goalkeeper' - could you not, in theory at least, if not in practice, call that playing in a dangerous manner?
No. Playing in a dangerous manner "includes preventing a nearby opponent from playing the ball for fear of injury" as a criterion.
It is not the only criteria but it must be part of it. But I can see where you are coming from. Yet another poor and ambiguous use of the word 'includes'. We have had this discussion before on another law.
How about the general concept of one can not foul a team mate. Fouls are only against an opponent. If that doesn't work, the 15-16 definition may help. This did not change (not listed as a change) only reworded to shorten it.
View attachment 3895
While IFAB has been blurring the lines between fouls and misconduct recently, I think it is remains that a foul is against an opponent or the opposing team.
While I agree that (again) IFAB managed to use awkward language to frame PIADM, I still believe the clear intent is that you have to have danger to someone that interferes with the ability of an opponent to play the ball.
But to go back to the question, why in the world would you be thinking of calling a foul on a player stupid enough to kick the ball away from his own GK?