Live I said red but it’s not as bad on second viewing... naughty but not red
Not as bad? Straight in the gonads. Clear kick out.Live I said red but it’s not as bad on second viewing... naughty but not red
Sky sports rightly saying Son was sent off for the same thing.I don’t think he even carded him so better refs than us lot agreed that it isn’t red... just because a few RefChat members agree it doesn’t make it so! It was naughty but red would have been harsh. Any thoughts on the Chelsea / dive pen appeal??
Don’t give us that, you’re constantly going in on refs on this forumI don’t think he even carded him so better refs than us lot agreed that it isn’t red...
VAR has seen all the angles! It’s not quite as bad as the Palace one!Sky sports rightly saying Son was sent off for the same thing.
Ref obviously didn't see it. His view was obstructed by Batshuayi's body
Fair enough but Var had the chance to uplift it and didn’t, maybe they are right and you are wrong??Don’t give us that, you’re constantly going in on refs on this forum
anyway, nailed on red for me. How it can be anything other than VC I don’t know
You say a few ref chat members, I say referees with no pressure on them and a clear mind. You say naughty, I say correct which means it was deliberate, and the only reason it would not be red is if it is accidental.I don’t think he even carded him so better refs than us lot agreed that it isn’t red... just because a few RefChat members agree it doesn’t make it so! It was naughty but red would have been harsh. Any thoughts on the Chelsea / dive pen appeal??
Not point in this forum then. They are always right as they are a higher levelFair enough but Var had the chance to uplift it and didn’t, maybe they are right and you are wrong??
I think Chels just got robbed. My first reaction is that Fred pushed the Chelsea player into his colleague... surely no offence and the goal should stand... no?