Not to derail this thread but reading all the posts made me think to ask this question...How do you feel about very verbal refs with which directions throw ins are going....for example, the ball goes out. Do you just signal or do you often signal and say..."Off white, blue throw" or something like that. What about goal kicks and corners? How vocal are you with your calls? Pros and cons to being vocal?
I think that actually ties into a bigger "refereeing style" question actually. I'm a naturally quiet person and so my personal approach is to try and be low impact and remain in the background where possible. And part of that is avoiding overusing the whistle or overusing verbal decisions where possible. Of course this only works if you can also develop a sense of when being low-impact isn't enough and are able to step up to being more involved when the game or even an individual decision requires it.
Similarly, I've seen other refs take very much the opposite approach - combining physicality (ie this works particularly well if you're tall and broad) with loud signals wherever possible. The idea being that players end up looking for you and and waiting for your call at every decision by default. Of course, the down side of this is that an unusually long pause or hesitation before a decision ends up looking indecisive rather than just normal as it hopefully does with my approach.
Either way, I think the general answer is to find an approach that works for you, stick to it the majority of the time and learn to recognise when it's appropriate to step out of that pattern.
In terms of derailing the thread, I do think this could maybe do with a separate thread -
@Ross would it be possible to split this post and the responses off?