https://www.givemesport.com/1515656...-would-look-right-now-if-var-wasnt-being-used
Interesting outlook on this season so far!!
Interesting outlook on this season so far!!
The offside decisions are absurdhttps://www.givemesport.com/1515656...-would-look-right-now-if-var-wasnt-being-used
Interesting outlook on this season so far!!
https://www.givemesport.com/1515656...-would-look-right-now-if-var-wasnt-being-used
Interesting outlook on this season so far!!
Beats the Mags 8-0 rout over the Owls thoSouthampton 0 Leicester 9... it’s good, but it’s not quite Sheffield United who STILL have the all time English League record.... (Record away win: Port Vale 0–10 Sheffield United (Second Division, 10 December 1892)
That was at The Sports Direct Arena so doesn't count!!!Beats the Mags 8-0 rout over the Owls tho
I think there may have been one other 8 goal defeat in the PL too. New record set
Also a couple of 7-4 games from memory
Yes, I saw it - astounding decision. The referee has simply guessed at what he thinks must have happened. He can't possibly have seen a handball because it wasn't even close to hitting Smalling's hand.If VAR was being used in the Europa League, we wouldn't have seen Chris Smalling penalised for a head-ball... What a bizarre decision, did you see it?
I'm know this. But it doesn't coach refs on how to handle multiple santionable offences in sequenceThere's one major flaw in that article - they seem to completely misunderstand what happens when there is a close offside call and the AR delays the flag. They seem to assume in some cases that if the flag didn't go up immediately, the goal would have been allowed without VAR and confusingly enough that in others, because the flag did eventually go up the goal would definitely have been chalked off had there been no VAR. Neither proposition is true.
Man United vs Ipswich Town, 1995. 9-0Beats the Mags 8-0 rout over the Owls tho
I think there may have been one other 8 goal defeat in the PL too. New record set
Also a couple of 7-4 games from memory
I'm know this. But it doesn't coach refs on how to handle multiple santionable offences in sequence
Is it just me or is this infringement by the substitute the very definition of a trifling offence that can and should be ignored?