No. The APP is from time of possession, so that potential foul was absolutely in scope according to the protocoLS. At the same time, I think (outside a couple of leagues) there is a huge reluctance to go back that far in time. In practical terms, I think a foul is going to have to be much more clear than that to go back that far in the WC.Is distance from goal a criteria to go back to check a foul?
Uh, since all is left is the semis and final, it didn’t matter how he did today, he’s done….This fella is having a shocker. Plane home tomorrow
Not even close to a red.Lucky to get a YC
Don’t think it’s C&O but can see an argument either way. Once you’ve given it, it surely has to be a red though?Whether this is seen as C&O, I’m interested. And it was, at the screen now, shocked if this isn’t given
Qué? That's not a DOGSO.Yellow, my arse. Absolute farce.
Mate it’s Engurland! Should be two penalties!!!Qué? That's not a DOGSO.
You can't guarantee he's controlling that well enough to get a shot off before the keeper gets to him, so no red for me.
I'll respectfully disagree looking at Mount's pace into the box and distance from the ball and that Lloris stayed back. Don't think it's clear cut either way,which is why I consider it luck he received a YC.Not even close to a red.