The Ref Stop

Cardiff Ref Strike

The Ref Stop
Frankly I find collective punishment baffling and disgusting CFA should warn against then come down hard on referees participating I have a real issue with this maybe it’s the neurodivergence or maybe I’m just a better human than some I cannot fathom punishing innocents in any aspect of life and find those who do utterly reprehensible.
Each to their own, but this is a very strange mindset you have.

How exactly can the CFA come down hard on them? If they ban them, then there’s less referees to covers games and so on……..

This happened a few years back when the young lad arranged the strikes (can’t remember his name). Can’t say it made much difference, but this is sadly the situation we find ourselves in.
 
The behavioural problem is caused by a small minority of despicable participants.
I don't think that's true.

We've debated the nature of the general attitude of the footballing public (not just players) towards referees on here before and I still say the problem is a cultural one to do with football globally as a whole.
 
I don't think that's true.

We've debated the nature of the general attitude of the footballing public (not just players) towards referees on here before and I still say the problem is a cultural one to do with football globally as a whole.
Agree. But I’d go as far as saying it’s a cultural problem towards most people in any form of authority
 
Agree. But I’d go as far as saying it’s a cultural problem towards most people in any form of authority
That's an entirely different thread and not really much to do with football refereeing but I'd not disagree with that claim in the slightest. ;)

The problem we have with football is that the abusive, disrespectful "culture" is generally accepted and has been for decades now, hence the reason I describe it as footballing "culture". It's "tribal" by it's very nature and so brings with it the negatives as well as the positives.
 
I read them shaking my head at certian accounts
Each to their own I guess. I fundamentally disagree with your view - collective withdrawal of labour is one of the few powers that any group of workers/volunteers have - but if we all agreed on everything it would be boring, as long as we disagree respectfully.
Frankly I find collective punishment baffling and disgusting CFA should warn against then come down hard on referees participating I have a real issue with this maybe it’s the neurodivergence or maybe I’m just a better human than some I cannot fathom punishing innocents in any aspect of life and find those who do utterly reprehensible.
The only punishment here is that teams will have to source volunteer refs. The FA, many CFAs and Competition Organisers can wring their hands and talk the talk as much as they want, but until the punishments to players AND clubs is meaningful enough, this will be a perpetual cycle.
 
Depending on the demands of a strike, I would possibly behave as a scab
I'm about 400 games in now and can only recall maybe 4 games in which behaviour reached the threshold which would justify a personal notion of striking. However, I know many many others have had much worse experiences
I understand that view - I reckon I'm close to 150 games in and would have had two, maybe three, such games - though depending on the direct cause(s) of the call to "strike" I'd be keen to support it.

The behavioural problem is caused by a small minority of despicable participants. In my experience, the FA don't deal with these folk effectively. I know of players with a very long disciplinary records who continually return from bans to behave exactly the same as they did before. This very small minority of participants need to be removed from the game completely
Yes and no imho. It's a much bigger cultural problem, both across football and wider society, but I would agree that at the level I referee at (Dog and Duck Sunday League, decent but not academy standard youth football) the transgressors/problem players and coaches are in a significant minority.

As many of you will know, my feeling is the relationship between referees and the football community is in tatters. The refereeing community are not blameless in terms of this being a two way street
I agree, and it's why I stopped following a lot of "refereee Twitter".
 
I can only see that (in theory) yes it should only be the offenders who are punished, but in reality that is never the best way to get a message across. The best way for me to explain it is like at school where an entire class would be punished for 1 or 2 peoples actions, this made everyone have a go at those individuals.

Sometimes hooligans need to be treated like children to get the point across.
Also if we are calling this overreaction a strike CFA should enforce the mandatory 2 weeks notice
 
I don't think that's true.

We've debated the nature of the general attitude of the footballing public (not just players) towards referees on here before and I still say the problem is a cultural one to do with football globally as a whole.
There's different levels of bad behaviour. I know I don't need to tell you that obvious fact!
I'm not too interested in routine misconduct. Toys out the pram, blame the ref, outbursts of discourse in the face of the disappointment of losing etc...
It's the vile nature from the much smaller minority that really does the damage. That's what you and I would be referring to in our 1, 2 or 3% of games. Get rid of these disgusting individuals and the routine misconduct improves because the regular 'bad lad' won't feed off anyone setting a nastier tone. I'm sure we've both had games which are going south, then we send off one, maybe two individuals and suddenly the game is 'normal'

Last Sunday for example, I Sin Binned a 'Walking Sin Bin'. He's worse than that though. I've encountered him a number of times and there's something not right with him. He has a history of assaulting a match official and a string of endless bans for other concerning stuff. Yet, he's still playing
HE is the problem. HE is the one who needs dealing with. HE should not be playing football. 'HE' refers to all such HE's
So if the strike was targeting the FA for inaction regarding all such HE's, I'd support it
But a strike without clear objectives/demands is just like the endless list of strikes which have achieved nothing and are pointless
 
Last edited:
How exactly to the CFA sanction a large group of referees? Then there’s no referees to referee.

On top of this, you can’t force someone to referee. We’re volunteers. If we don’t want to referee, we don’t have to.
if appointed and no show on strike day disciplinary hearing same as if you fail to appear any other week anyone supporting this farcical strike has no logical argument and if you gave a clear indication of sanctions many would act more sensible
 
if appointed and no show on strike day disciplinary hearing same as if you fail to appear any other week anyone supporting this farcical strike has no logical argument and if you gave a clear indication of sanctions many would act more sensible
Again, you simply come off the game. As stated, referees are volunteers- no one can force them to be there.

Sanction them all. Then you have no referees to officiate games for a longer period.

Referees have an element of power in that there are shortages. CFA’s cannot simply go out and replace the referees.
 
Also if we are calling this overreaction a strike CFA should enforce the mandatory 2 weeks notice
Now you are being ridiculous. Referees are not employees, they are not required to go out and referee on any given weekend, they choose to offer their services. If they choose not to do so, collectively or on their own, it isn't a strike as such, it is rather people choosing not to volunteer. If you were comparing it to actual employment it would be like companies being short staffed because employees didn't volunteer to work extra hours as overtime. At a company I worked at until a few years ago we were all working very long hours, and we weren't entitled to overtime, until a horror of a new CITO came in and started shouting at us and being abusive. So we all got together and agreed we would all start at 9 and finish at 5, and take the full hour for lunch, no union was involved, was entirely our choice that we decided to only work our contracted hours.
 
Now you are being ridiculous. Referees are not employees, they are not required to go out and referee on any given weekend, they choose to offer their services. If they choose not to do so, collectively or on their own, it isn't a strike as such, it is rather people choosing not to volunteer. If you were comparing it to actual employment it would be like companies being short staffed because employees didn't volunteer to work extra hours as overtime. At a company I worked at until a few years ago we were all working very long hours, and we weren't entitled to overtime, until a horror of a new CITO came in and started shouting at us and being abusive. So we all got together and agreed we would all start at 9 and finish at 5, and take the full hour for lunch, no union was involved, was entirely our choice that we decided to only work our contracted hours.
Actually I would say due to there wording CFA has a great case to enforce.
 
Actually I would say due to there wording CFA has a great case to enforce.
There is nothing to stop them closing their dates or telling the appointments officer but sorry I am no longer available. Nothing at all. If they accept the appointment and don't turn up then yes there is a case to answer but outside of that Im not sure what they could do
 
There is nothing to stop them closing their dates or telling the appointments officer but sorry I am no longer available. Nothing at all. If they accept the appointment and don't turn up then yes there is a case to answer but outside of that Im not sure what they could do
Up here if you pull out under 72 hours notice from county appointment you expect to assist in sourcing replacements so strike wouldn’t work
 
Up here if you pull out under 72 hours notice from county appointment you expect to assist in sourcing replacements so strike wouldn’t work
Again, you’re a volunteer . No one can force you to referee and no one can force you to find a replacement referee.

If you don’t turn up, you don’t turn up. Can the County punish you in some way? Sure. Are they going to punish a large group of referees? Not a chance, they can’t afford to.
 
Back
Top