It's just a still. It tells us nowt.
Serious foul play involves a players actions being (in the opinion of the referee) "excessively forceful".
I'm guessing a red card wasn't issued because none of the officials deemed it so.
I'm fully aware of the law and that the officials obviously didn't think it was a C&O error. But it certainly looked a C&O error for me. Ticks all the boxes for SFP. Waltons explanation was baffling too
Walton's job is to justify a decision, no matter how bad. How baffling is that?I'm fully aware of the law and that the officials obviously didn't think it was a C&O error. But it certainly looked a C&O error for me. Ticks all the boxes for SFP. Waltons explanation was baffling too
I enjoyed Stuart Brennan's description of Walton in the MEN match report - "Backing those two up, quite literally, was BT Sport's resident ref pundit Peter Walton, a man who performs contortions worthy of an Olympic gymnast trying to justify the unjustifiable"Walton's job is to justify a decision, no matter how bad. How baffling is that?
"DOGSO" at 2.25 (Welbeck elbows Cancelo in chest); SFP at 3.40.
And the non-penalty:wellbeck actually trips cancello causing cancello to fall onto wellbeck
Yes, that's a PK, but as we've seen before and contrary to the LOTG, winning the ball in the PA is pretty much all that counts in the EPL
As I understand it, for the professional level the referees are told by the powers that be which kit to wear.More annoyingly for me and probably only me is the officials choice of colour of shirt(don’t actually know who picks it)
Are these City goggles available online or just in the Club Shop?wellbeck actually trips cancello causing cancello to fall onto wellbeck
Damn those powers that be!As I understand it, for the professional level the referees are told by the powers that be which kit to wear.