Just seen it. Shouldn't have even stopped play.For the equalizer (1-1), why did Mike Dean restart play with a FK?
Very confused...
Did Souress just say that it should have been a contested drop ball?!
Just seen it. Shouldn't have even stopped play.
VAR should have got involved. That is a serious match changing error. The only reason I think is that West brim do win the ball so does that break the link back to the error in the attacking phase?
Yes, which shows his complete lack of understanding of the laws.
Better restart option that a Liverpool free kick
Not really. The free kick was a refereeing error, a contested dropped ball would be incorrect in law.
It was in jest
A free kick is incorrect as well as there's clearly no offence
Yep you are right. Hadn't considered that. Mental.No way VAR can get involved under the protocol. They can go back to the build up to the goal, but they can't go back to before play was restarted to correct an incorrectly awarded free kick.
I find him beyond irritating. Pundits should have to do a yearly laws test!Yes, which shows his complete lack of understanding of the laws.
Not for me. Blocks the goalkeepers line of vision. Always offside.Goal for me that, don't think the keeper is impacted at all. He reacts totally normally to the initial header
I think I disagree, the player is in a position that makes him interferring with play.That's a goal for me
Not for me. Blocks the goalkeepers line of vision. Always offside.
Agree. VAR looked at the first header, the offence would have been from the actual shot on goal.Don't agree at all tbh
The way he reacts tells you that he's not blocked at all