The Ref Stop

Search results

  1. D

    City v Wolves

    My view is that the initial decision not to award a penalty was fine & the defender’s arm in a natural position & similar to that of the City forward close by (for reference). I am also content for VAR to have referred the Referee to have a look again at the incident & congratulate the Referee...
  2. D

    Annual level 5-4

    I was also pleased to see Jonathan Wilks being promoted to L2. He has been a L3 for quite a few years & was mentored/coached by the late Gary Willard, whereby if he was still around, he would have been over the moon.
  3. D

    Annual level 5-4

    That is a lot of L4’s for a mid-season promotion (though I haven’t looked back to last season’s mid-season). Hope the system can cope & that they can get regular games in the middle & not just on the line, albeit on the line will provide them with valuable experience. I was interested to see...
  4. D

    Man Utd vs Man City

    I don’t really have a problem with KH, especially since his view is also subjective based upon years of experience, but to say HW is not fit for purpose for what was a subjective decision was unfair & inappropriate for the positions he has held in the past and that he holds now.
  5. D

    Man Utd vs Man City

    He also had it in for Mike Riley with the connection being clear - both held/hold the position he once had. He has also gone sour on HW after he was hoping for better things, especially since HW became a PL Referee on his watch (I think).
  6. D

    EFL referee appointments

    If it is ZKK, then he has had a quick rise to where he is. What I can say is that I have Observed him as a L4 & L2 and the improvement seen from a raw L4 to L2 was the difference between night & day. He listens & takes on board the information like a sponge - though only adopts what he believes...
  7. D

    Man Utd vs Man City

    I have noticed that based upon Howard Webb’s comments, Mr Keith Hackett has not only launched an attack on the VAR on the game (who didn’t ask the Referee to view the incident) now being appointed to a high profile game, but has decreed that Howard Webb is not fit for purpose. I agree with...
  8. D

    2026 Potential Law Changes

    That to me seems appropriate, so much so that the only appeal I have received this season - which was self referred, was because I realised 7 days after the game in question from having a senior moment, that I suggested that to the Referee, that this is what he could of done at a time wasting...
  9. D

    2026 Potential Law Changes

    The period since Jan 2021 includes Covid, but I get your point, though the trials have been extended to other county FA’s/competitions & likely to grow further, perhaps to all, though with the costs involved it’s perhaps not a surprise the FA had to roll them out over a period of time.
  10. D

    Brighton v Bournemouth Penalty

    Referees get in the neck whatever they do - he gave a brave caution (often criticised for not making their own mind up), but then as you say VAR probably had to intervene. However, could the Referee not just have said not sufficient/minimal contact & therefore no penalty!
  11. D

    Arrested for an elbow/assault

    Or so long ago that prices have since risen. My view at the time was that it was nothing like the incident from a few days ago & that I didn’t much see wrong with the players nose at the time & continued to play in both games, but at the end of the day, a head butt/VC is exactly that. Strangely...
  12. D

    Arrested for an elbow/assault

    Any player at the receiving end of VC can refer the issue to the police, but if the incident is seen on-line & especially when it goes viral as in this case, then the police are likely to intervene anyway. It does help, but not a 100% requirement if at least one of the officials identifies the...
  13. D

    Annual level 5-4

    Fairly good percentage, but those 30 who missed out will I suspect be very disappointed.
  14. D

    Luton v Swindon Sub error

    Swindon are claiming that FA confirmed with them that Clarke’s ban did not include games played in the Vertu Trophy & have a lawyer on both those and the unnamed player on the team sheet. If by saying that they checked on the Portal that the Vertu Trophy is not included for suspensions, then we...
  15. D

    Level 3/4 LOTG tests

    Just needs an A-Z or a Search Engine now 😂
  16. D

    Level 3/4 LOTG tests

    There will be a proportion who may get all right, but the vast majority will get a few wrong. Anyone at 85% or above are doing ok/very well.
  17. D

    Addicted

    I was gobsmacked and surprised to be made aware that for having reached 1,000 posts earlier today I was awarded an addicted badge. My wife on the other hand was not surprised (that I was addicted). 😂
  18. D

    Luton v Swindon Sub error

    At least Drinian didn’t score!
  19. D

    Luton v Swindon Sub error

    It will be interesting to see what comes out in the wash, which I would expect to be fairly quick, because what we don’t want again at this level (or any level) as Tom Jones once sang “History Repeating”!
  20. D

    Luton v Swindon Sub error

    Good point & if there was an avoidable error from the 4th official/AR, then another reason why Swindon should not be thrown out of the competition. However, it does always make me smile when people say, leave it to the FA to make the right decision without actually saying what they believe to be...
Back
Top