One of the 10 players for Chelsea would go into goal. Liverpool would reduce to equate.
Liverpool vs Chelsea
- Thread starter Joshref
- Start date
One of the 10 players for Chelsea would go into goal. Liverpool would reduce to equate.
You'd caution him again, and hopefully he'd know he's lucky to still be on the field of play...
Or do you mean 2 cautions, both in KFTPM?
socal lurker
RefChat Addict
Cautions reset when KFTM start.
I assumed they were taking about him getting two during kftpm.
spuddy1878
RefChat Addict
Cant believe there was a thread on this and the Keita challenge has only just been brought up.
Its one of the easiest red cards you will see for me, i dont blame the referee (who had an excellent game) but how can VAR look at that and think its not a red card.
Its one of the easiest red cards you will see for me, i dont blame the referee (who had an excellent game) but how can VAR look at that and think its not a red card.
I think what may of saved him from a red card was the intensity, its the only thing I can think of. The other thing is, Attwell gived advantage to Liverpool so surely that is a clear and obvious error to intervene, as Attwell must'nt of fully seen the contact from Mane?
Macca
Active Member
No way was that a red card challenge. Sure, foot was near waist high when challenging for the ball, but Chalobah also has his foot at the same height, and his speed in moving towards the ball meant the force was more so from his movement as it was from Keita's foot being high.
Oh, and agree with offside decision on VVD.
Oh, and agree with offside decision on VVD.
Chalobah can have his foot whereever he wants as long as he isn’t endangering the opponent, so him having his foot high and moving quickly isn’t relevant to how Kieta goes in for the challenge. It’s not Chalobahs responsibility to get out the way of it
I thought Atwell handled it with common sense in the circumstances. He was aware of what Kepa was up to and kept him in check at every penalty. No damage done and it all worked out in the end.
no, any order...keepers could have gone again!
Nah, it was borderline farcical by about the 4th penalty. There's no point repeatedly giving the same warning if it becomes clear you're not going to act on it. Should have been asked to stay on his line initially, told on the second kick and booked on the 3rd. And I'm arguably being too generous there.
PinnerPaul
RefChat Addict
No - any order they like - player who took the 11th penalty could take the 12th if he wanted to.
Peter Grove
RefChat Addict
This.
As is clearly spelled out in Law 10. Immediately after the paragraph giving the regulations for the "sudden death" phase and up to where all eligible players have taken a kick, it states:
one
RefChat Addict
I think you answered your own question. ABBA system is not a 'valid' system. Also my question was for true consecutive kicks (irrelevant of team).
In short my question was not answered
