A&H

A bit windy

The Referee Store
Idfk for double touch.
Thinking, possibly caution for SPA, I don't think DOGSO is certain although the 2nd attacker does seem to come in just after picked up by keeper so could be persuaded. Enough doubt and sympathy for the keeper to go yellow.

That is of course if you are Continuing this game in what appears to be farcical conditions.
 
JamesL said:
Idfk for double touch.
Thinking, possibly caution for SPA, I don't think DOGSO is certain although the 2nd attacker does seem to come in just after picked up by keeper so could be persuaded. Enough doubt and sympathy for the keeper to go yellow.

That is of course if you are Continuing this game in what appears to be farcical conditions.
Click to expand...
I am sure you weren't considering red for the goalkeeper handling in his area to deny a goal/opportunity . . . 🤔
 
ChasObserverRefDeveloper said:
I am sure you weren't considering red for the goalkeeper handling in his area to deny a goal/opportunity . . . 🤔
Click to expand...
Ummm yep:

The goalkeeper has the same restrictions on handling the ball as any other
player outside the penalty area. If the goalkeeper handles the ball inside their
penalty area when not permitted to do so, an indirect free kick is awarded but
there is no disciplinary sanction. However, if the offence is playing the ball a
second time (with or without the hand/arm) after a restart before it touches
another player, the goalkeeper must be sanctioned if the offence stops a
promising attack or denies an opponent or the opposing team a goal or an
obvious goal-scoring opportunity.
 
JamesL said:
Ummm yep:

The goalkeeper has the same restrictions on handling the ball as any other
player outside the penalty area. If the goalkeeper handles the ball inside their
penalty area when not permitted to do so, an indirect free kick is awarded but
there is no disciplinary sanction. However, if the offence is playing the ball a
second time (with or without the hand/arm) after a restart before it touches
another player, the goalkeeper must be sanctioned if the offence stops a
promising attack or denies an opponent or the opposing team a goal or an
obvious goal-scoring opportunity.
Click to expand...
Also from Law 12:

A player, substitute or substituted player who commits any of the following offences is sent off:

  • denying the opposing team a goal or an obvious goal-scoring opportunity by a handball offence (except a goalkeeper within their penalty area)

so the sanction would not be a dismissal IMHO
 
ChasObserverRefDeveloper said:
Also from Law 12:

A player, substitute or substituted player who commits any of the following offences is sent off:

  • denying the opposing team a goal or an obvious goal-scoring opportunity by a handball offence (except a goalkeeper within their penalty area)

so the sanction would not be a dismissal IMHO
Click to expand...
The offence is not handball here though........
 
ChasObserverRefDeveloper said:
Also from Law 12:

A player, substitute or substituted player who commits any of the following offences is sent off:

  • denying the opposing team a goal or an obvious goal-scoring opportunity by a handball offence (except a goalkeeper within their penalty area)

so the sanction would not be a dismissal IMHO
Click to expand...
Sorry, but that is wrong. Keeper handling it twice isn't a handling offence, so there can be sanctions, not that I would be advocating them being used.
 
ChasObserverRefDeveloper said:
Also from Law 12:

A player, substitute or substituted player who commits any of the following offences is sent off:

  • denying the opposing team a goal or an obvious goal-scoring opportunity by a handball offence (except a goalkeeper within their penalty area)

so the sanction would not be a dismissal IMHO
Click to expand...
It's not hand ball though it's a second touch. And the law I posted includes with the hand/arm
 
Until a couple of years ago, this could not be a caution or send off because the GK used his hands. IFAB recognized the absurdity and changed it so that the GK can be sanctioned for a non-handling offense even if the hands are used. A second touch is an offense separate from the use of the hands, so the GK could be called for SPA or DOGSO (F).
 
JamesL said:
Idfk for double touch.
Thinking, possibly caution for SPA, I don't think DOGSO is certain although the 2nd attacker does seem to come in just after picked up by keeper so could be persuaded. Enough doubt and sympathy for the keeper to go yellow.

That is of course if you are Continuing this game in what appears to be farcical conditions.
Click to expand...
What is spa?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top