A&H

Dutch Referee Blog - Week 1 Laws of the Game Quiz 2018-2019

Yeah, the new quiz season starts. This is the first quiz of 2018-2019 and based on the latest LOTG changes for the new season. Good luck! After submitting the quiz, you can see the answers. Bezig met laden…

Continue reading...
 
The Referee Store
Regarding Q5)
Presumably, the yellow card would be downgraded to no card if the advantage had led to a goal?
 
Regarding Q5)
Presumably, the yellow card would be downgraded to no card if the advantage had led to a goal?

Bare with me as I'm only 7 games in, but from what I've read wouldn't this still be a yellow even if it lead to a goal? If it would be downgraded it would be good to know why according to the LOTG for future reference.
 
Last edited:
Regarding Q5)
Presumably, the yellow card would be downgraded to no card if the advantage had led to a goal?
No. The clarification this year was that a yellow card should be shown.

For reference:
Screenshot_20180921-165023_Drive.jpg

Essentially what might have been a DOGSO is downgraded to
• commits a foul which interferes with or stops a promising attack except
where the referee awards a penalty kick for an offence which was an attempt
to play the ball

Now if in the penalty area and a genuine attempt for the ball then we would possibly not need to caution.

I think that scenario @one raise with ifab who advised that might be a revision for next year.
 
Thanks for highlighting that part, the amends section is one I never delve into as this is my first season. Will definitely dive in next time I pick up the book.
I have updated my answer. Its important to follow the explanations for a change as sometimes they lose context in future editions.
 
I have updated my answer. Its important to follow the explanations for a change as sometimes they lose context in future editions.
Yes
I didn't specify that the DOGSO in question as a genuine attempt for the ball inside the box as that was implied in Quiz Q5)
Discussed here;
https://www.refchat.co.uk/threads/clear-this-one-up.12234/#post-127258
Other DOGSO offences (i.e. USB) inside the box would still warrant a YC, because they're RC offences
So DOGSOF<ailure> = RC downgraded to YC or YC downgraded to nowt
Amended to;
So DOGSOF<ailure> = RC downgraded to YC or YC downgraded to nowt (i.e. genuine attempt to play the ball in the PA)
Hence, the correct answer is not listed --> No card
 
Last edited:
Back
Top