Russell Jones
RefChat Addict
Cheshire & Capn, I'm going to quote Cheshire here, please choose your words carefully. Padders, whilst often controversial (it's a forum, isn't that the point?!) hasn't made any personal comments within this thread. Both of you have. It's wholly obvious that he's not in a "1vsALL" situation as others have posted in agreement. Think carefully about what you post, of you will end up with warnings and/or thread bans.
Dan, I honestly think you've been suckered in here by @Padfoot 's clever way with words. Prior to his 'idiots' post on Page 3 of this thread, many forum members had already expressed a strong preference for playing more rather than less advantage. These included (I believe, apologies if I'm mis-representing anyone) @RustyRef , @Cheshire Ref , @GraemeS , @CapnBloodbeard , @Kes and @RegalRef . Therefore my reading of his post was that he felt those members to be idiots in this regard. Judging by their reaction, some other people felt the same way ...
This feels to me like one of those match situations where one player has sneakily and slyly goaded another into retaliating in some way ... then the person who retaliated has been punished but the initial transgressor has got off scot free ....