one
RefChat Addict
Not withstanding the discussion on handball offences I can't think of any offence that can be deemed as interfered with a promising attack and advantage wasn't played.
By virtue of definition, if it's an offence and advantage is not played, play is stopped. It then becomes stopping a promising attack (not interfering).
By the same token, if play is not stopped, then advantage is played and the recent change doesn't want a caution. Hope this logic makes sense.
Wouldn't it just make sense to remove 'interfering' out of the SPA wording?
By virtue of definition, if it's an offence and advantage is not played, play is stopped. It then becomes stopping a promising attack (not interfering).
By the same token, if play is not stopped, then advantage is played and the recent change doesn't want a caution. Hope this logic makes sense.
Wouldn't it just make sense to remove 'interfering' out of the SPA wording?